Creationism vs Evolution

Discussion in 'Debate Corner' started by Jason76, Nov 6, 2018.

  1. Jason76

    Jason76 Package Team Member Package Team

    4,369
    275
    155
    +380
    22
    -0
    Do you feel creationists have an argument. What might it be? Myself, I have difficulty thinking things evolved to what they are. Nonetheless, other creationist arguments - like an old earth are backed by too much science.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2018
  2. Soopairik

    Soopairik Reputable

    184
    29
    35
    +44
    3
    -0
    I am an evolutionist.
     
  3. Jason76

    Jason76 Package Team Member Package Team

    4,369
    275
    155
    +380
    22
    -0
    Why?
     
  4. Soopairik

    Soopairik Reputable

    184
    29
    35
    +44
    3
    -0
    Makes more sense to me.
     
  5. Jason76

    Jason76 Package Team Member Package Team

    4,369
    275
    155
    +380
    22
    -0
    As I mentioned on your forum, a big argument brought up - and rightly so, is that there simply isn't an instance of animals changing into other ones - except when politics is involved. :D
     
  6. Soopairik

    Soopairik Reputable

    184
    29
    35
    +44
    3
    -0
    There is proof. Go back to mine and there's a link someone already posted.
     
  7. Newtflame

    Newtflame New Arrival

    24
    3
    3
    +3
    0
    -0
    Huh, I was expecting there be a lot more lashing out on this thread. However, I feel that some creationist might have some arguments, mainly those pointing out some holes or unanswered questions in marco evolution and how earth and life truly came to be.
     
  8. Soopairik

    Soopairik Reputable

    184
    29
    35
    +44
    3
    -0
    What holes?
     
  9. Newtflame

    Newtflame New Arrival

    24
    3
    3
    +3
    0
    -0
    By holes I just mean missing links between the transition between one creature to another, or findings of certain birds and mammals before the dinosaurs came the dominant creatures.Many still use that whole deal of archeraptor to testify against the theory. I'm just pointing out the arguments they use.
     
  10. ATMD

    ATMD New Arrival

    5
    0
    1
    +0
    0
    -0
    I believe in intelligent design.

    Both systems of thinking are based on faith, especially when one starts talking about the origin of the universe.
     
  11. Soopairik

    Soopairik Reputable

    184
    29
    35
    +44
    3
    -0
    One is based on science, not faith.