Statistically Impossible results in the Republican primaries

[Deleted member 1609]

Re: Statistically Impossible results in the Republican prima

In my experience, candidates from the Libertarian party are more hard right than libertarian. They care about free markets far more than they care about personal freedom.

My presidential vote in 2012 will be for Stewart Alexander, the Socialist Party USA candidate.

 

[Gimgak]

Re: Statistically Impossible results in the Republican prima

All Republican candidates would be equally bad for the LGBT community. Even Obama isn't all that progressive on LGBT issues. It's extremely scary that someone like Rick Santorum is even in mainstream politics in this country. In most other Western democracies, he'd be shunned for being a complete whackjob (which he is).

As the other person said, Ron Paul is one who wouldn't hurt the progress of the LGBT community. However if I am not mistaken he isn't all for gay marriage himself,but believes it should be the states that decide whether to make it legal or not. He is like this for alot of topics such as marijuana.

He is more of a Constitutionist.

Yeah which I think is what makes Ron Paul one hell of a cool guy. I mean just think about it; even if he doesn't agree with a certain cause or issue he doesn't go out of his way to be completely against it, he simply wants what will work for those people if it isn't hurting anyone.

 

[Watch Me Sink]

Re: Statistically Impossible results in the Republican prima

In my experience, candidates from the Libertarian party are more hard right than libertarian. They care about free markets far more than they care about personal freedom.

My presidential vote in 2012 will be for Stewart Alexander, the Socialist Party USA candidate.

It looks like we're both going to be voting for somebody who won't win the general election, though my guy will probably get more 😛

 

[NBK*Twitch]

Re: Statistically Impossible results in the Republican prima

All Republican candidates would be equally bad for the LGBT community. Even Obama isn't all that progressive on LGBT issues. It's extremely scary that someone like Rick Santorum is even in mainstream politics in this country. In most other Western democracies, he'd be shunned for being a complete whackjob (which he is).

As the other person said, Ron Paul is one who wouldn't hurt the progress of the LGBT community. However if I am not mistaken he isn't all for gay marriage himself,but believes it should be the states that decide whether to make it legal or not. He is like this for alot of topics such as marijuana.

He is more of a Constitutionist.

Yeah which I think is what makes Ron Paul one hell of a cool guy. I mean just think about it; even if he doesn't agree with a certain cause or issue he doesn't go out of his way to be completely against it, he simply wants what will work for those people if it isn't hurting anyone.

He is one of the few that still have not been taken to the dark side of the govern=ment.

 

[Deleted member 1609]

Re: Statistically Impossible results in the Republican prima

In my experience, candidates from the Libertarian party are more hard right than libertarian. They care about free markets far more than they care about personal freedom.

My presidential vote in 2012 will be for Stewart Alexander, the Socialist Party USA candidate.

It looks like we're both going to be voting for somebody who won't win the general election, though my guy will probably get more 😛

My guy probably won't even be listed on the results. :lol:

 

[Gimgak]

Re: Statistically Impossible results in the Republican prima

Doesn't Romney have links to "teen help" camps that were used to sexually abuse children?