What is your opinion on our current president?

I don't really like to get into politics too much because I don't like it when people act like they know more than they really do. However, I do want to say one thing that has been bugging me for the past few weeks as I have been reading through Facebook posts.

Presidents are put into the position they are in because they are qualified (whether we believe it or not). Everyone bashes every president for everything they do, right or wrong. I just want to say that it is not an easy job, and posting all over things like Facebook without looking into the entire situation (and I'm not talking about turning on your local news or listening to what mom and dad say. I'm talking about real sources that aren't one sided; The Economist magazine for instance) makes you look like an idiot. I promise you that you cannot do a better job, at least most of us can't. You have to look at the situation that were thrown at the presidents during their time in office.

Everyone thinks they are a politician these days, but they don't take the time to really learn the trade. Just my thoughts.
 
Obama's a cool guy. Eh, changes Pepsi logo and doesn't afraid of racism.
 
Snobothehobo said:
I'm still waiting for the "liberal media" to give Stewart Alexander and other genuinely liberal candidates some actual coverage. Everyone over at FOX seems to believe that every other station is socialist, but how can they be socialist if they don't even have socialists on their stations? 😛
The most attention the mainstream media gave to Jill Stien was when she got arrested outside of the Hofstra debate. And even then it didn't last too long, once everybody started coming after Obama's perfect performance in that debate.
 
Obama's perfect performance in the debate where he basically quoted Romney word for word and changed a couple small things. 😉

Jill Stein was only arrested because corporate interests don't want her to debate Obama and Romney. Everyone knows she'd win by a landslide. Gary Johnson would smash Obama and Romney as well if he were put in there.
 
Snobothehobo said:
Obama's perfect performance in the debate where he basically quoted Romney word for word and changed a couple small things. 😉

Jill Stein was only arrested because corporate interests don't want her to debate Obama and Romney. Everyone knows she'd win by a landslide. Gary Johnson would smash Obama and Romney as well if he were put in there.
Jill Stien would win in a debate, since I think she was the best public speaker out of all of the candidates, but I'm not too sure she would win the election. The Green party puts a lot of emphasis on environmental protection, and while I support the cause, I think the #1 issue should be the economy. I love her anti-bailout views, but I also don't think the government should be bailing out students. Heck, I'd love for my student loans to be forgiven, but I don't think it would be economically possible for the government to do that.

Gary Johnson would have done so much better in the election if the media ran things about him and didn't make it a whole Obama vs Romney thing. Isidewith.com had him winning many states when it came to the issues, not popularity. I found it funny watching the third party debates and seeing Johnson, Stien and Anderson agree on so many things even though the Green Party is extremely liberal and the Libertarian party is very fiscally conservative (not too sure where the Justice Party is, since they're brand new). Even on economic issues, they were all agreeing with each other that we shouldn't have bailouts for companies and we should stop our military presence in hundreds of countries and focus on rebuilding here. If congress worked like those three did, they would get so much done.
 
The truth is: the invisible group purchases the right to all say over its governmental officials, political figures, military, and social dictation.

The rich jews you mean right? Those would make easily the majority of this group you mention. (Me thinks.)

I don't want to come over in a bad way but we all know this:

American is run in the background by the jews. 😛
 
master412160 said:
The truth is: the invisible group purchases the right to all say over its governmental officials, political figures, military, and social dictation.

The rich jews you mean right? Those would make easily the majority of this group you mention. (Me thinks.)

I don't want to come over in a bad way but we all know this:

American is run in the background by the jews. 😛
tKgXr.webp
 
Snobothehobo said:
I'm still waiting for the "liberal media" to give Stewart Alexander and other genuinely liberal candidates some actual coverage. Everyone over at FOX seems to believe that every other station is socialist, but how can they be socialist if they don't even have socialists on their stations? 😛
Fox News shows the opinions of both sides, and even leans left in many cases, with my favorite example being Geraldo Rivera's effective endorsement of Occupy on-air.

NBC, CNN, etc. are extremely biased to the Left, therefore anything less biased becomes more biased to the radical people of the Left.
 
Nuke said:
Snobothehobo said:
I'm still waiting for the "liberal media" to give Stewart Alexander and other genuinely liberal candidates some actual coverage. Everyone over at FOX seems to believe that every other station is socialist, but how can they be socialist if they don't even have socialists on their stations? 😛
Fox News shows the opinions of both sides, and even leans left in many cases, with my favorite example being Geraldo Rivera's effective endorsement of Occupy on-air.

NBC, CNN, etc. are extremely biased to the Left, therefore anything less biased becomes more biased to the radical people of the Left.

One problem with your argument... ALL news companies are bais and spew bullcrap... IDC who the hell it is...
 
Nuke said:
Fox News shows the opinions of both sides, and even leans left in many cases, with my favorite example being Geraldo Rivera's effective endorsement of Occupy on-air.
We need to get rid of this idea that we have that there are "two sides." There are actually many sides to every argument. I'm still waiting for legitimate leftists like Stewart Alexander and Jill Stein to get any coverage whatsoever in the media.

Barack Obama is not left-wing by any means. Droning civilians isn't exactly something that people on the left enjoy doing, nor is giving tax breaks to the rich.
 
One thing that I love about our media in the US is how biased it is. The state-run Russian news agency not only runs more news-worthy stories than the US media, but does a much better job providing the facts than opinions. RT it's called, Russia Today, Russians Today? Something like that.

Also worth noting that Russia is one of the most corrupt nations in the world too.
 
I respect every elected president as long as they don't infringe my constitutional rights. This also applies for any government official "congressmen, senator etc..."
 
He's got a serious Drone Addiction.

And a Nobel Peace Prize to show for it. Maybe he "Changed" the way logic works?
 
I don't care for him to much. The last election really left us with no choice. Both Romney and Obama weren't good candidates.
 
Abu Taj al Deen said:
If Bush wasn't impeached, no way Obama will be.

Can you give me one impeachable offense Bush committed? I can give you a handful of impeachable offenses Obama has committed.
 
Watch Me Sink said:
Nuke said:
Russia is win. Russia Today is not.
What makes you say that?
Sorry for that delay.

For a long time, I thought Putin was bad. I also thought RT was too biased.

While I don't like the political views that I often see presented on RT (i.e. The Zeitgeist Movement aka Skynet-Matrixist Communism), I do not believe they're pro-Putin; to the contrary, RT is biased against Putin.
USAPoliticsForumCom said:
Abu Taj al Deen said:
If Bush wasn't impeached, no way Obama will be.

Can you give me one impeachable offense Bush committed? I can give you a handful of impeachable offenses Obama has committed.
I'm moving to Russia. Obama killed hundreds of innocent US citizens, including civilians, police, and military. Why? Politics. He created more gun crime to drive gun control legislation. He had Al Qaeda terrorists kill troops in Benghazi and said it was just "spontaneous" despite a prolonged battle to promote his "Al Qaeda is on its heels." rhetoric. He falsified unemployment rates. He protected people who committed racial hate crimes because they were minorities. The impeachable offenses are insane in their bulk and severity.
 
Back
Top Bottom