Some casino gamers tell me that they go to the casino to play and not to gamble. That is a defensive statement to mean they are there for a diversion, to entertain their boring life. The next question is where is the boundary to that diversion? Or maybe should I say how much is the boundary. I know of a person who bets on horse racing with a budget of less than 1 dollar. When he wins, he can bet again and extend his playing time. But when he loses his capital, he stops because for him, betting on horses is just for the fun of it although he can be lucky sometimes to win. With the casino, I guess that should also be the case otherwise engaged in gambling can ruin your finances.
Boundary of casino gaming re gambling and diversion
- Thread starter Corzhens
- Start date
Affiliates
