Corrupt and Bonehead Democratic Party

Jason76

Madly Diligent
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
7,207
Reaction score
959
FP$
572
Don't get me wrong it's no better than with the Republicans. I mean, how about when Clinton dumped Arkansas rice on Haiti - forcing poor people into worse conditions?

Anyway, the democrats are also in on any CIA type corruption like supporting a drug war which funds sinister activities like overthrowing Communists, probably funding Islamic extremists, and funding a prison/industrial complex.

Well, taking out Communists is good but not by using dirty money!!
 
Clinton owns many villages in Haiti including children, but I won't get too deep into that conversation.

The Democrats are a party filled with non-civility, obstruction, etc. Talk about safeguarding our elections, but won't vote for Voter ID or safeguards. Talk about racism, but judge people based off their skin color. Talks about sexism, but judges people based off their genders.

It's quite a amusing party, honestly. If you like being a hypocrite it's for sure a party for some people.
 
L O L.

Someone's trying to distract from the fact that the President of the United States committed treason on live television today. You just happen to bring up old shit that various Democrats have done? Red herrings, red herrings everywhere...

I'm just gonna leave this here...

CtKl5CJ.jpg
 
L O L.

Someone's trying to distract from the fact that the President of the United States committed treason on live television today. You just happen to bring up old shit that various Democrats have done? Red herrings, red herrings everywhere...

I'm just gonna leave this here...

CtKl5CJ.jpg

Still waiting on that evidence Russia hacked into the DNC servers, but since the FBI never had access to such a thing I guess we will never know, but how was that DNC primary though when Clinton rigged it for herself against Bernie? Oh wait let's ignore proven election rigging over a fake witchhunt. Let's never talk with Russia and go to nuclear war with Russia instead. Hope you're willing to go to the front lines of the war. 😉
 
Hope you're willing to go to t he front lines of the war.
Maybe I'll fake bone spurs to get out of it. 🙄

It's amusing the right is more anti-war and pro-peace, while left is pro-war and anti-peace. 😛

If it's treasonous to want peace to avoid nuclear war I will take the label. It's just amusing though nonetheless.

If you want to talk about treason though, why did Clinton take $400 million from Russia for her campaign?
 
Hope you're willing to go to t he front lines of the war.
Maybe I'll fake bone spurs to get out of it. 🙄

It's amusing the right is more anti-war and pro-peace, while left is pro-war and anti-peace. 😛
Not sure how you got that conclusion, but I'm sure you have fallacy-filled logic to explain it.

To clarify, I'm all for peace and no war. We haven't belonged in most of the conflicts we've been in since the second world war ended. I'm honestly more isolationist than anything when it comes to actual war/conflict (we should interact and engage globally for trade and commerce, but mind our own business unless it's truly a global war/conflict.
 
Nuclear war? With Mutually Assured Destruction isn't that not a worry with either party being in power?
 
Hope you're willing to go to t he front lines of the war.
Maybe I'll fake bone spurs to get out of it. 🙄

It's amusing the right is more anti-war and pro-peace, while left is pro-war and anti-peace. 😛
Not sure how you got that conclusion, but I'm sure you have fallacy-filled logic to explain it.

To clarify, I'm all for peace and no war. We haven't belonged in most of the conflicts we've been in since the second world war ended. I'm honestly more isolationist than anything when it comes to actual war/conflict (we should interact and engage globally for trade and commerce, but mind our own business unless it's truly a global war/conflict.

What you say contracts it if you think it is wrong to try to get along with Russia.

Nuclear war? With Mutually Assured Destruction isn't that not a worry with either party being in power?

Well the US has weapons more powerful that nuclear weapons, which was declassified by the Pentagon earlier this year. We could take out China and Russia without notice fairly easy with a nice space weapon we have. I was amused the media didn't make it a big deal when it was announced, but oh well.
 
If it's treasonous to want peace to avoid nuclear war I will take the label.
There are a lot of steps between siding with Russia over our own intelligence agencies and nuclear war with Russia. I'm not in favor going to war, but there's no reason to stand in front of the world - next to Putin - and side with them over your own country's intelligence. Trump talked about the US as if he has no ties to this country today.

If you want to talk about treason though, why did Clinton take $400 million from Russia for her campaign?
Again, red herrings everywhere. You should try another fallacy once in awhile.
 
Well the US has weapons more powerful that nuclear weapons, which was declassified by the Pentagon earlier this year. We could take out China and Russia without notice fairly easy with a nice space weapon we have. I was amused the media didn't make it a big deal when it was announced, but oh well.

Why does this remind me of Vader's Death Star? :bored:
 
There are a lot of steps between siding with Russia over our own intelligence agencies and nuclear war with Russia. I'm not in favor going to war, but there's no reason to stand in front of the world - next to Putin - and side with them over your own country's intelligence. Trump talked about the US as if he has no ties to this country today.


Again, red herrings everywhere. You should try another fallacy once in awhile.

I guess it is more believable to believe in something without evidence like Russiangate a DNC server that never been seen or investigated with simple accusation and he said she said and not $400 million sent to the Clinton camp, huh? It's easier to believe a family who literally tried to steal the furniture out of the White house after a certain Clinton got impeached. :lol:

Edit: That rating someone is salty.

Why does this remind me of Vader's Death Star? :bored:

Well it isn't a Death Star and it couldn't blow up the planet. Unlike a nuclear weapon which you could at least have a chance to survive depending on where it drops and the location you are in our new weapon that is in space guarantees no survival rate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll just say this: the Republicrats are very happy that people are fighting over party labels. It distracts them from realizing that both parties are screwing them by monopolizing elections so that they can better serve their corporate masters.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Democrats along with corruption have the oversensitive thing. I mean, it's understandable to get angry over cross-burnings, but not a lot of stuff commonly in the news, and also stuff mocked by conservatives. Anyway, Bill Maher was pointing this out in his comedy routine and it is so right! I mean, he said if they want to win elections, they got a quit being so flaky.
 
Democrats along with corruption have the oversensitive thing. I mean, it's understandable to get angry over cross-burnings, but not a lot of stuff commonly in the news, and also stuff mocked by conservatives. Anyway, Bill Maher was pointing this out in his comedy routine and it is so right! I mean, he said if they want to win elections, they got a quit being so flaky.

Thing with Bill Maher he also said he hopes for a economic collapse to get rid of Trump. He didn't care if people got hurt over a economic collapse. I wouldn't listen much to Bill Maher not much of a heart for other people.
 
I'll just say this: the Republicrats are very happy that people are fighting over party labels. It distracts them from realizing that both parties are screwing them by monopolizing elections so that they can better serve their corporate masters.
I'm sorry, but you're incorrect.

Last time I checked, more Dems than Repubs supported net neutrality.
Who supported Citizens United outcome? Oh right, the Repubs. Who opposed it? RIght, the Dems.
Who supported the South Dakota anti-corruption bill? RIght, the Dems. Who overturned it? The Repubs.
Who supported the Racial Justice Act? The Dems. Who opposed it and overturned it? The Repubs.

The Democrats ARE NOT the same thing as the Republican Party!
 
PATRIOT Act? Bipartisan. War in Iraq? Bipartisan. NDAA? Bipartisan, and strongly supported by Barack Obama, who was a constitutional lawyer in his past life. Democrats and Republicans alike are in love with the TPPA, and the Democrats are just as much to blame as the Republicans for the fact that we still don't have single-payer. There are a few isolated issues where the Democrats are in line with real liberal values, but they are few and far between. When it comes to most of the issues that matter, Democrats are just as happy to stick to the status quo as the Republicans. They also made sure that Hillary Clinton, who has a long history of being a "Third Way" Democrat (which is code for being a Republican with a "D" behind her name), beat Bernie Sanders in the primary. The Democratic Party is not fighting for ordinary citizens.
 
Back
Top Bottom