There seems to be a popular movement to end them. Nonetheless, drug deaths are still a big problem. In fact, I'm in my 40s and many of my classmates have died from drugs. Is it a wonder why laws against drugs exist and many places are not Amsterdam?
Drug Laws
- Thread starter Jason76
- Start date
I've got mixed feelings about the drug laws here in the UK. Currently around 75,000 people die a year from smoking cigarettes, 10,000 die from alcohol-specific causes while less than 5,000 die because of drug related reasons of which nearly half that number are due to prescribed or off-the-shelf drugs.
After a lifetime of working in the music industry I've seen a huge amount of recreational drug use but I'm not aware of anyone I know coming to harm from it. Conversely I can't even tell you how many friends, close relations and work colleagues I know who have died prematurely from alcohol abuse or lung cancer, or at best are chronic alcoholics. Certainly more than I can count on all my fingers and toes.
I think laws need to be proportionate. I wouldn't advocate for the legalization of crystal meth or drugs in that league but I feel quite strongly that the penalty for just carrying cannabis in the UK which can be up to five years in prison is an obscenity.
After a lifetime of working in the music industry I've seen a huge amount of recreational drug use but I'm not aware of anyone I know coming to harm from it. Conversely I can't even tell you how many friends, close relations and work colleagues I know who have died prematurely from alcohol abuse or lung cancer, or at best are chronic alcoholics. Certainly more than I can count on all my fingers and toes.
I think laws need to be proportionate. I wouldn't advocate for the legalization of crystal meth or drugs in that league but I feel quite strongly that the penalty for just carrying cannabis in the UK which can be up to five years in prison is an obscenity.
In Virginia, just 20 miles away cannabis is legal. 🤫
It's bizarre how in some areas of the world it's a prescribed medication and completely legal whereas in others it's a hanging offence.
I've smelt it on a public bus in a small town (in Virginia). Everyone is doing it home, it seems like. Myself, I never was into it or have the desire.
Uncrowned Guard
Resident
The efficacy of current drug laws is a matter of ongoing debate, and there's a growing argument that these laws might not be the most effective tool in addressing drug-related issues. A key consideration is redirecting resources from enforcement to education. The case of cigarettes illustrates this: stringent laws against underage smoking had limited impact, but a combination of practical age restrictions and educational campaigns about health risks significantly reduced cigarette use among minors.
When considering illegal drugs, there's a compelling argument that many of the dangers arise not from the drugs themselves but from issues related to their illegality. Tainted drugs, incorrect dosages, and varying strengths often result from the unregulated nature of the illegal drug market. For instance, Fentanyl, a substance linked to numerous drug deaths, is often unknowingly consumed by users due to its undisclosed presence in other drugs.
Now we are currently targeting pain management patients who have daily pain from injuries and illness to prevent them from getting Fentanyl in some crazy attempt to reduce the number of heroin users dying from their dealer lacing their bag with Fentanyl. Not only is this not fixing the problem, but it is now creating MORE drug users as previously managed patients with chronic pain are turning to alternative sources to help them function all day.
While the outright legalization of all drugs is a contentious and complex issue, there is no doubt in my mind that we have people completely out of touch with the problem in charge of making these laws. This reevaluation should involve a more practical understanding of the issues at hand, focusing on reducing harm and addressing the root causes of drug abuse. It's a multifaceted problem that requires a multifaceted solution, blending law enforcement, public health, education, and harm reduction strategies, with most of these topics ignored with the selected legal decision normally being "just ban them".
When considering illegal drugs, there's a compelling argument that many of the dangers arise not from the drugs themselves but from issues related to their illegality. Tainted drugs, incorrect dosages, and varying strengths often result from the unregulated nature of the illegal drug market. For instance, Fentanyl, a substance linked to numerous drug deaths, is often unknowingly consumed by users due to its undisclosed presence in other drugs.
Now we are currently targeting pain management patients who have daily pain from injuries and illness to prevent them from getting Fentanyl in some crazy attempt to reduce the number of heroin users dying from their dealer lacing their bag with Fentanyl. Not only is this not fixing the problem, but it is now creating MORE drug users as previously managed patients with chronic pain are turning to alternative sources to help them function all day.
While the outright legalization of all drugs is a contentious and complex issue, there is no doubt in my mind that we have people completely out of touch with the problem in charge of making these laws. This reevaluation should involve a more practical understanding of the issues at hand, focusing on reducing harm and addressing the root causes of drug abuse. It's a multifaceted problem that requires a multifaceted solution, blending law enforcement, public health, education, and harm reduction strategies, with most of these topics ignored with the selected legal decision normally being "just ban them".
One sad problem with drugs is birth defects. In fact, that's why even though I have strongly opposed abortion on a lot of forums, I can't totally dismiss the opposing argument. I mean, the situation with deformed kids is so sad that it's unbelievable and also this turns you against drug legalization.
Affiliates
