I like to hear your idea's then! post them into the community matters section
I've sent them to
@Joshua Farrell already but I'll happily summarise them here for you
🙂
Basically I think the spectral of reviews offered in the most recent guidelines was a bit condensed and too much emphasis on the "freestyle" approach which was questionaires and community feedback. I think through offering users a choice of different categories which are selected upon ordering, many questions they have regarding that specific section will be answered and elimiate the purpose of questionaire reviews; Likewise, while community feedback is great, the richness and variety you get when multiple-perspectives are offered can sometimes be really beneficial and helpful but the sole focus of it alone, isn't necessarily for the best. Community Feedback should be coupled with professional, indepth reviews by FP's own Reviewers to provide that professional (and paid for) depth while allowing the addition of those additional perspects.
The FP$ we work so hard to get, much also be respected and that respect should found the basis for the pricing of these reviews- they need to be priced correctly where they are not "too cheap" but also not too costly, they should be affordable and functionable for the magnitude of webmasters we have here and then the service needs to be pitched right to prove it's worth and benefit to these webmasters and get them involved in the service and order-chain.
Just my thoughts, I led a Review Team on a reputable site a couple years back and through accsessibility and choice, we catered for a large variety of the forum members and provided them with beneficial feedback which we watched get put into use and grow their sites, which was a very rewarding part of the job
🙂
