I post a 90/10 content strategy. 90% of the content is native to FB. That's text posts, uploaded reels, uploaded galleries and stories. The other 10% is promotional content which is links to my YouTube videos and my blog posts.
I kinda agree, but then I disagree. Yes, you CAN use native content. But in my experience, I don't see activity on "native" content. Pages with "image uploads" only work when it's a meme. Reels on Facebook is so convoluted, it's abysmal. I like instagram's style of reel uploads. It just works, but with facebook, its like someone screwed up the code. I honestly don't see activity there, either. I see activity between family members, but other than that, it doesn't do the same idea as instagram. You need the mobile app to actually use reels. Stories is even worse. That's from my experience, and it's my opinion.
I find that I'll usually get significantly more views on native content than external content.
This is Facebook making that happen.
Once again, I kinda agree, but also completely disagree. Yes, there's an algorithm on Facebook, and it's controlling what you see. However, "posts" from native content works, but then don't. I have a page with 12k fans on it, and most of it is geared towards Call of Duty. In this page, if you post a long native content, they'll just wait for the next status update. That's because they are sanitized with seeing off-site content. It used to be a Call of Duty Blog, so as long as those users EXPECT you to post off-site content, then, they'll follow you anywhere. I post gaming news on this Call of Duty blog with a wide range of subjects, so when Call of Duty comes around, they'll interact better. But you need to teach them to like your content.
ALL social media platforms are putting less view weight on external posts.
Yes, but... I feel like this is nuanced. In fact, if you look at Twitter, they curate the "best" (subjective to THEM) content on the right bar. That's where the "breaking news" happen. In your mind, you shouldn't think about getting on that bar, you want to grow a fanbase before you get there. Sanitize your users into liking your content. Under Elon Musk, I've seen more likes and retweets on pages that are Call of Duty related, and get traffic - even if it is a social signal, or gives me a little bit of traffic. Don't worry about instant conversion. It's about branding for the long term.
This applies to FB's content feed, by the way.
They want people to remain on their platforms so their ads are clicked. That's how they make their money.
I don't click on ads. Most of the ads currently are garbage. Any platform.
So, you should still post promotional content BUT try to post more native content. You want to create a community of loyal social followers. That's how you convert. You don't even have to post links. I'll say "posted a new video" or "posted a new blog post" and they know where to go.
If you just post external content - you're missing out on a lot of potential traffic but it takes work to get that!
I explained this a little bit earlier, soo I'll skip here.
So, I think hashtags are pretty much dead. Most of the platforms are trying to get people to use them less. I quit using them on Instagram and my views hasn't changed at all.
I think hashtags require time to research them. I say don't waste your time on them. Try to focus on the words you use, your copy, and visually appealing media.
This is bold faced,
hard "disagree." I've been using hashtags since Twitter made it famous. I use hashtags everywhere I go. And I don't expect immediate conversion. As long as the person sees it, I'm good. Look, this is how I see it...
Now, sit there and pay attention. The network is let's say Twitter, Facebook, and yes, YouTube. Now, YouTube has a limit of 3 hashtags per post. But I see people using hashtags on the bottom of their posts. I don't know if that works or not, but YouTube has a different algorithm than the top 3 Social Media websites combined. People are complaining at YouTube over it.
Okay, so let's get back to the subject at hand: The algorithm on the network determines what gets ranked, and what gets downranked. So, external sites in general are "downranked" like you said, but if you do everything at once, that doesn't matter. If you use a combination of text, images, and hashtags in the same post, the algorithm goes "okay. I'll rank you a little higher." You say hashtags is dead; I disagree with that. And I have the traffic to prove it.
Anyway, Google sees Social Media as a ranking signal, so anytime you post to Twitter, AND reach people with hashtags... Overtime, your link will get stronger. Again, don't worry about immediate conversion. Let your content sit there, and allow people to go to the link in their due time. Your tweets also appear on Google. That's collateral damage and it's a good thing. Because one of these days, someone's gonna see it and click it from THERE. So google shows referral FROM Google. It's either a link on the actual search engine, or the link from Twitter.
😉
If someone sees your post from hashtags, that's an impression. If they like the post, then they're interacting with it. If they retweet, then more people see it. If you just use text, you are at the whim of the search bar on said social media website. Facebook SHOULD be a search engine, but Zuckerborg keeps ignoring his best employees. Twitter has search, but this is more limited than you think it is. Again, everything is curated on Twitter, so the top posts are "favored," some people use the "latest" tab, and sometimes your keywords don't get curated into either list. This is why I say it's very risky. Hashtags FORCES YOUR POST(S) to be thrusted into either list. If you are the top post in the "top" list, then your post is popular. What you really want to do is to at least be in the "latest" tab. AT LEAST.
That's what hashtags are for.
This is the #1 thing you should be doing!
I use a social media scheduling service to automate my posts so that I can focus on engagement the most. 🙂
This is a bad idea. Because your posts do not come off as "a human posting it." Your users are just gonna assume you automate it, and miss out traffic from outside of hashtags.