Innocent until proven guilty or guilty until proven innocent?

[Katrina]

Which do you live by?
Innocent until proven guilty or guilty until proven innocent?

 

[Chev]

I’ve always gone by the “innocent until proven guilty” card. You simply can’t make someone guilty without the proper evidence to support it.. I mean you can.. but not legally.

 

[NBK*Twitch]

Innocent until proven guilty for sure.

 

[Deleted member 31696]

I believe that any person accused of a crime is presumed to be innocent until his or her guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[Shortie_]

I have always gone by the innocent until proven guilty and that is how I was brought up as well.

 

[MrDawn]

I think it should be innocent until proven guilty. We don't want to lock up the wrong person without evidence proving they committed the crime. The Burden of Proof in a Court of Law is very important.

 

[zappaDPJ]

Innocent until proven guilty in a Court of Law. I believe plea bargaining is an outrage on every level.

 

[Ravenfreak]

I believe Innocent until proven guilty, I don't think I've ever heard anyone saying "Guilty until proven innocent."

 

[The Raven92]

"Innocent until proven guilty " of course. Look at this modern scenarios. Woman report you for rape and you have to defend yourself as if that's true. Those fake accusations ruined people lives.

 

[timewo]

In the internet sector in some countries domain investors are considered guilty until proved innocent and the government wastes millions of taxpayer money trying to find non existent evidence against some innocent citizens for more than 13 years.

 

[Jason76]

It should be innocent until proven guilty. It's really sad when people jump to conclusions and innocent people are wrongly accused.

 

[Naza]

I think it's innocent until proven guilty. that's what I grew up knowing.

You can't accuse me of a crime without having solid evidence.So as they say,we are all innocent until proven guilty.

 

[Kirubel]

I will go with, " Innocent until proven guilty" because being guilty will make a person lose a lots of privilege's and since guilty person is treated as a guilty person no one who is innocent should not be treated like that.

 

[Artisan Vistra]

Computer code is wrong until it is proven right. It can approach being right but it never is because there's more than one way to go about it. Proof theory is a bunch of definitions to varying degrees which ends off at the highest point. Axioms are decisions. You either agree or disagree. There is no right or wrong if you pick an axiom that is different from the one supposed for the victim of the persecuted. Whatever is done for the guilt of the victim is witnessed and allowed by the prosecutor who let it happen. Both parties are either guilty or not guilty.

 

[King Belieal]

I have been in a position where I have been wrongly accused if something I don't have an idea about. People should be treated innocent till they are proven guilty because you won't be able to restitute for that guilty treatment he or she was given when it turns out he or she was actually innocent.

 

[Min George]

I believe that people should be cut some slack and be treated as innocent until there is irrefutable proof that the person is guilty. It is impulse to assume a person as guilty simply by what you think or feel.