New Signature

no my avatar is of Sourabhee Debbarman a Indian singer and signature is of Demi Lovato
 
I'm not a big fan of it. I think that you chose a poor font, and background. Just doesn't go with the flow in my opinion.
 
thanks for the review, the font i also think that it needed some more 3D looks and the background i made by self.

i will keep that in mind for my new signature ๐Ÿ™‚
 
I would really suggest some tutorials.

The signature doesn't have any flow, blending, depth or light source. The text doesn't fit there as well.

I hope I wasn't harsh but I just gave you my opinion ๐Ÿ™‚

Try and view some tutorials. Some techniques there will really help you.
 
np i was waitng for some critiques because it is a signature i made a long time after my last signature and is perhaps my 3rd or 4th signature in total as i am not much interested in making signatures and so i don't have ideas on signatures much but i tried to keep it as light and beautiful as possible, i didn't wanted her to look hot and that was my sole concentration on it ๐Ÿ˜›
 
Ashish92 said:
thanks for the review, the font i also think that it needed some more 3D looks and the background i made by self.

i will keep that in mind for my new signature ๐Ÿ™‚

As I've seen your work here and there, I tend to see the same style of text you call "3D". Try using different styles and not just the 3D style. With a little more practice and tutorials, I'm sure you can make it far. ๐Ÿ˜‰
 
Dy.namik said:
Ashish92 said:
thanks for the review, the font i also think that it needed some more 3D looks and the background i made by self.

i will keep that in mind for my new signature ๐Ÿ™‚

As I've seen your work here and there, I tend to see the same style of text you call "3D". Try using different styles and not just the 3D style. With a little more practice and tutorials, I'm sure you can make it far. ๐Ÿ˜‰

no i haven't uploaded any particular 3D work of mine yet on net ๐Ÿ˜›
the style you wud have seen of mine here and there is just a combo of layer effects.

actually most of the works i have in my portfolio were done before january when i was self learning GIMP and now i am trained in photoshop and some 3D softwares so my new graphics which i will upload soon are better to be called #D looks ๐Ÿ˜›
 
The graphics work outcome has nothing to do with which software you use, I mean I created the below images with GIMP and they look just as good, maybe even better than they would Photoshop.

2cpoubm.webp

312b4zl.webp

2hhhtt4.webp
 
the works by you as i said earlier looks great for the simplicity you use in your observation for creating them, the work isn't much but the colors and simplistic approach enhances the features.

what i am trying currently is to mess around with GIMP (i started using after a gap of 7 months) to see how much improvements i have made and how complex work i can do now (output even if horrible is not my major concern because it maybe a single part of the graphic i like most and that cud help me in future graphics.)

and software do matter when you are importing self made renders. a render by blender will be better than photoshop because of material features.
 
May I see some of your GIMP GAP animations?

I'm currently trying to find out how to use it. ๐Ÿ˜›
 
the work i did in the gap of 7 months was on photoshop which i never used before that ๐Ÿ˜›

wanna see some of it ?
 
check your PM and add me on messenger.

and everyone can teach anybody because everyone has something unique in them ๐Ÿ™‚
 
Back
Top Bottom