Hello,
You may have read my previous thread of my wonder in why many people disliked norton so greatly. Well today I have seen.
My computer usually started up with norton in about 6 to 8 minutes on a warm boot. On a cold boot, around 20 minutes. Well I thought the problem was RAM related. Little did I know, Norton was using over 50% of my computer's resources. It slowed down and crashed firefox, made opening ZIP files hard and long, and right clicking was way out of the question. If I had to run anything graphical, it would crash.
Well I removed Norton today, and in the restart, it took one minute to load and get FireFox up.
This is why not to use Norton. It isn't your computer, it is the hog anti virus.
You may have read my previous thread of my wonder in why many people disliked norton so greatly. Well today I have seen.
My computer usually started up with norton in about 6 to 8 minutes on a warm boot. On a cold boot, around 20 minutes. Well I thought the problem was RAM related. Little did I know, Norton was using over 50% of my computer's resources. It slowed down and crashed firefox, made opening ZIP files hard and long, and right clicking was way out of the question. If I had to run anything graphical, it would crash.
Well I removed Norton today, and in the restart, it took one minute to load and get FireFox up.
This is why not to use Norton. It isn't your computer, it is the hog anti virus.







