The president of our country had recently declared the rebels a.k.a. freedom fighters to be considered terrorists. Those rebels are staying in the remote mountain areas for so many decades before I was born. It makes me wonder why they have to be fighting that way. In fact, rebellion here is not violent unlike in some African countries. Those rebels are just pain the neck of the government, so to speak. When the present president assumed the position, he opened the gates for peace talks but the aging leaders of the rebels have nothing good to say so the peace talks did not prosper. And as I said, those rebels are now considered terrorists.
We don't have a close encounter with the rebels here but almost. In one trip to a family friend who lives in the forested mountain, my husband was surprised with the cheap cost of the land so he intimated to the friend there that maybe we can buy 5 hectares and turn it into a small ranch with maybe 10 heads of cattle at first. The friend said that it's not a good idea because the rebels will come and make that ranch their milking cow which means they will ask for one head for their food.
So where are the freedom fighters in that scene?
Since 2007, Forum Promotion has specialized in providing advertising solutions to webmasters looking to promote their communities. We pride ourselves in being the bridge that connects forum administrators, bloggers, and more.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.