Rich Edmonds
Seasoned Veteran
Earth Be Lost™ said:Actually THT is wrong... THT stated that PR doesn't effect SERPs what so ever even though it's been *proven* that it does, sure some sites with a low PR may outrank a domain with a high PR but if you look around, it's rare. 😉
what do you mean "it's rare"? Have you actually searched for every term and have saved all results to compare between? Didn't think so. I'll fire you an example, a client we started with had a brand new website and of course had a PR of 0. They began ranking in the first page above other sites who had higher PR. So in effect, PR does not mean you rank high for keywords, which is what you basically stated. It hasn't been proven that PR affects SERPs entirely. It's been proven that PR is taken into account within the algorithm when sorting websites and is mainly used to show how Google views your website.
I say it has little impact, are you saying I'm a fool when I work within this world day in day out?Earth Be Lost™ said:I'll agree that a high PR isn't the only main factor in SERPs but it *does* help and anyone who says it doesn't is a fool!
Didn't say they would, I was providing factors that are taken into account by any search engine to rank a website.Earth Be Lost™ said:- age of the domain.
Yes, that's a factor but that's also why they sell for a high price and I don't see anyone around here going to buy a 9 year old domain for like $60 ...
Are you serious? Linking to external websites does not lower your PR. That is the funniest thing I have ever heard of. Where on earth did you read or hear that?Earth Be Lost™ said:- Links to other sites.
A good factor but guess what!?! Linking to other sites lowers your PR and is why it's a factor...
You are correct, however changing your URLs from dyanmic (?=topicnumber&postnumber&reply) to static (forum/forum/topic-1) then all helps a little, but granted you can't really do much with forum software. although with blogs and such there is always room for improvement.Earth Be Lost™ said:- Structure of site.
Sure, I'll buy that one... it's got to help, just common sense but if your using a forum software then your kinda limited to a few things in the structure... amirite?
Actually, regularly updated content (blogs, fourms, dynamic homepages etc.) improve your chance on being crawled over backlinks. If you have more backlinks but an inactive site that hasn't changed for a while, you wont get crawled more than a site with half links but tons more dynamic content and more activity. The points haven't been proven as most backlinks either created, or bought, do not attract visitors as most link building is borderline blackhat SEO. So:Earth Be Lost™ said:Yes, focusing on backlinks is a mistake... but backlinks help. 🙂
I agree that focusing on the content is good, having a good community is good, and supplying what people want is also a really good tip... I can see where your coming from and it proves your a good admin and webmaster but to become a *great* one you've got to get your site out there as well and backlinks to other sites will do a lot of things...
1) Attract visitors from the site the backlink is on.
2) Get you a PR which *does* help with SERPs.
3) Get your site crawled more often.
4) Earn you more money if you decide to sell your website/forum/domain.
Those are points which have been proven and undeniable by anyone.
1) No.
2) Backlinks improve your SERP rankings more than improving your PR score, depending on keyword choice and pages linked to.
3) Not particularly, although if your site is new then yes you will need at least a dozen links from actively visited websites.
4) Correct, so long as they are good quality (money money money).
A PR 0 site would be cheaper, have more content, be easier to work with and have a better structure than the PR 5 website, regardless of the domain (I would buy it for the site, not just the brand). The chances of the PR 0 site not being one is the same as the PR 5. The PR site may be ranking heavily for another keyword or long tail term, not necessarily the keyword I am after. Thus, PR doesn't help, it's all down to SEO. How would you get more traffic and get keyword rankings if the site above you already has a better strategy in place and is days/months ahead of you? If they have an effective campaign in place, you wont be able to touch them. Regardless of PR score.Earth Be Lost™ said:You'd rather a PR0 website that ranks number one over a PR5 domain? Well chances are the PR0 isn't going to be number one... and I'd go with the PR5 as if it is the case I'd buy some really high quality content for insurance, focus on some keywords, get some more traffic to the site and then sell it off for a really good profit... to be perfectly honest.
You basically stated that it IS a huge factor for ranking, it's not. PR is a tool, an indication. It is not a "HEY WEBMASTERS! THIS IS HOW WELL YOU RANK FOR ANY KEYWORD IN OUR SERPS!" It's a tool from gray cloud to a high 10, which will display how well you are doing through optimization. That is it. Sure, it's a factor considered by Google, I didn't say it wasn't but compared to backlinks, content, age, and so on and so forth, it's not worth the bother. Optimizing for keywords and spending time on other aspects will bring up your PR regardless. So would you rather focus on your PR and neglect other aspects or focus on all factors and raise your PR anyway?Earth Be Lost™ said:Your example above is crap mate... it's like me saying the sun is smaller than pluto. Sure you can rank badly for your keywords but websites with a PR4 kinda, mostly, a good 90% have good keywords due to it coming with the process of building your backlinks and getting a PR. I know it's an indicator, I never said it wasn't I said it helps with the SERPs, which is undeniable...
The PR ranking system is up to date. Google also doesn't provide data on how it's viewed but google's bot source has been leaked a little while back and guess what!?!? It *did* infact have PR as a factor... go find it if you don't believe me and look for yourself.







