Yeah, so what?
-Look at vBulletin's default blue skin. I'm sure you've probably seen that skin, or a variation of it quite a few times, on large forums. Its a professional, clean skin, so why not use it? Achieving professionalism by using a common theme is no problem; no issue; nothing wrong with that.
-People only say its overused because they haven't seen at least 200 forums in their Internet life. The more forums you have, the lesser the amount of times the skin has been used. Once you see 5000 forums, you will probably find that 10-20 have the same skin. 10/5000 is 0.2%, which isn't a big number.
-"Overused" skins are "overused" since they are popular, look good and designed well. Wouldn't you want a great looking skin, rather than the default phpBB skin (which in turn for phpBB is the most used skin as its default)?
-Skin may not be a key factor in a site's success. When the site can generate enough organic traffic, the skin becomes not as relevant, so why not use a good looking skin, regardless of many forums, large or small, using it? It could attract a certain amount of members on top of the sites SEO success.
-If everyone receives the same comment: "the theme is overused", then everyone changes it, then no one would be using that skin anymore, making it "underused". What good would that achieve for the creator?
That's what I have to say about those who tend to repeat this statement. There's no constructive criticism there. Just misleading comments.
You can use that skin even if you find it overused, or someone else makes a comment about it.
Anyone agree?
🙂
-Look at vBulletin's default blue skin. I'm sure you've probably seen that skin, or a variation of it quite a few times, on large forums. Its a professional, clean skin, so why not use it? Achieving professionalism by using a common theme is no problem; no issue; nothing wrong with that.
-People only say its overused because they haven't seen at least 200 forums in their Internet life. The more forums you have, the lesser the amount of times the skin has been used. Once you see 5000 forums, you will probably find that 10-20 have the same skin. 10/5000 is 0.2%, which isn't a big number.
-"Overused" skins are "overused" since they are popular, look good and designed well. Wouldn't you want a great looking skin, rather than the default phpBB skin (which in turn for phpBB is the most used skin as its default)?
-Skin may not be a key factor in a site's success. When the site can generate enough organic traffic, the skin becomes not as relevant, so why not use a good looking skin, regardless of many forums, large or small, using it? It could attract a certain amount of members on top of the sites SEO success.
-If everyone receives the same comment: "the theme is overused", then everyone changes it, then no one would be using that skin anymore, making it "underused". What good would that achieve for the creator?
That's what I have to say about those who tend to repeat this statement. There's no constructive criticism there. Just misleading comments.
You can use that skin even if you find it overused, or someone else makes a comment about it.
Anyone agree?
🙂







