One thing I like about FP as opposed to TAZ and Sitepoint is that saying criticism about Discourse and XenForo won't result in a mob jumping on you. E.g. you calling it barebones or me criticising the theme / trust levels in Discourse.
That kind of mentality isn't cool. Everyone has a right to their own opinions. As long as you're nice, I won't trash you for disliking something. I'll just agree to disagree.
🙂
The number one forum software isn't even vB or phpBB, it's some Chinese one called Discuz. It's kinda like vB, but with a less bad theme and a lot of the oddball social network features which vB3 was guilty of abusing.
That's because China is yuuuugggggggeeeeeee. I mean, it's
huge. Most American companies want a piece of the China pie.
There's a translation for Discuz, but it doesn't have much of a following outside China, plus if I vaguely recall, there was a problem with the licensing.
Yeah, Trademark infringement. Discuz sounds like "Discuss." And on top of that, if IB feels threatened by Discuz, you can bet your ass they'll come after them.
After that, it's vB and phpBB, about equal, but vB is so dated and so insecure that you'd have to be crazy to adopt it in the modern day.
I say the same about phpBB.
Those three take up most of the forum market. After that, it was SMF. And then, it was XenForo and IPB. And then, the others. That's the market. And I see a lot of Discourse, even banks are adopting the thing, Sitepoint which is an admin site far bigger than TAZ uses it, etc.
Anyone running SMF is going to face a lot of spam, and a lot of hacking. I've seen it first hand. But I understand what you meant here.
But to be fair, it's market-share is only like half of MyBB. It seems to mainly be used by big boards though, probably due to the costs of VPS' having taken a while to come down, plus culture.
In my opinion, though, MyBB is just too basic. I know someone that uses it, but doesn't realize that it doesn't have good SEO for it. xenForo does.
vBulletin broke SEO's of many sites as soon as vB4 came out, same for vB5. Because of the way they index their pages nowadays.
Discourse has a large backing purely because it was created by Jeff Atwood, it's funded by venture capital and his name can summon a legion of programmers. It's an awful software. But it's probably the most modern thing on the market, especially with XenForo stagnating for over five years.
Let's step backward here. Discourse is more open-source, the backing from VC's are for coding and coding only. It's not like vBulletin where he can just brand it and sell the actual thing as if it's the next big forum software. The idea with Discourse according to Jeff (and yes, I met him) is he's trying to eliminate "bloat." When I met Jeff, Discourse was very much competing with vBulletin. xenForo was brand new at the time (ForumCon 2015, I believe). In my opinion, he risks his software to look too basic. It's why I never converted to Discourse. He wanted to sell Discourse to me, not business to business kind of thing, but he wanted me to be a customer of Discourse. But I just didn't like it. I still don't, even though I've seen a few sites customized with Discourse.
XF2 was a huge disappointment, I was looking forward to it, but it showed just how out of touch Kier is with the modern world. It's the new phpBB.
Actually, no he isn't. He never designed XF2 to "change things." He designed it from day one to eliminate previous problems with XF1. Most requested feature of XF2 was the ability to add new breadcrumb items. We can do that freely now. His original idea was to eliminate the bottlenecks of XF1, and make xenForo faster. And he successfully did. I love xenForo, but a lot of the software needed to be streamlined, and fix some of the feedback he got. There was really nothing wrong with xenForo, other than a few bottlenecks that we didn't like about it.
The market is always moving, and if you stay still for too long, then you wind up getting swallowed up. And to be fair, Discourse is always hopping onto the latest and greatest JS spec technologies, the main problem is the theme and the insistence on certain things like "trust levels".
Don't put too much stock onto "js." The core codebase, ideas, and whatnot are the reasons why most forum software stopped using it. It invites similar hacks to "php injunction." It's been done with vBulletin in the past. Don't be surprised if vulnerability arrives for the new js codebases.
Eventually.
IPB is basically just an enterprise version of XenForo, with the millions of bells and whistles enterprise entails, although I'm not sure there's much of a difference any-more with how clunky XenForo is compared to modern sites.
And hey, IPB is nothing great, but at-least they're somewhat trying with the reactions, clubs, etc. I don't expect it to be sleek and hip, the thing seems to be the sort that would cater mostly to enterprise, but I do expect it to keep up with the changes in the world.
xenForo is quite simple if you just pay attention to everything. My opinion? You just don't want to re-learn things.
IPB wants to be the enterprise version of vBulletin, it's why they keep charging people more for the software they develop. Not xenForo. xenForo is only $140 just to get the base forum. IPS charges "Forums" for $100, but at checkout, they're selling you the whole package. $625 for Suite Core, Forums, Calendar (FREE!), Commerce, Pages, Blog, Gallery, and Downloads.
Granted, you can remove some of that off the list, but they want YOU to buy them.
With xenForo, Pages is part of the xF core, Blog and Downloads are in "Resource Manager," so I mean, they're scamming their customers. Pages should be part of the core, not the way they charge it! *facepalm*