Would you rather be 4’5” or 7’7”?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 49125
  • Start date Start date
D

Deleted member 49125

I’ll go for the 4’5”. It’s about a foot shorter than I am now. I couldn’t imagine being 2’ taller. Being small, you can fit in so many spaces. Being too tall, you can’t even go around normally.
 
I'm in the middle of those two results. I do not want to be any more taller thanks
 
I'd rather be shorter but today at the store, I couldn't reach some food way up on the top shelf and no one was around to help. So being tall has its benefits. They need to really leave some poles out for the short people or something so we can get the food that's higher up or pushed far back on the top shelves.
 
I think dwarfism gives you a longer lifespan than gigantism so... Im still not sure of my answer but let that help Your answers
 
I'd rather be shorter because I heard super tall people like that don't live very long. The organs work too hard to power such a large body.
 
Back
Top Bottom