Would you use AI SEO?

[Ghost]

Would you be interested in a website integration (such as a JS script) that can auto-apply best practices for SEO?
Just curious if this is something the community is interested in.
For example, automatic SEO for best keywords on forum threads, etc.

 

[ConradBleu22]

That sounds vert intriguing and i might take a look

 

[Bryn]

Really depends if it would be reliable or not, because AI is becoming more of a grey area these days...

 

[Nomad]

I have been using keywords suggested by ChatGPT for a long time.

 

[Page]

I think it would be cool if AI does it for you every month 🙂 It does take away from US people's thoughts. However, it's not going to have a person touch by any means.

But I will be interested 😉

I have been using keywords suggested by ChatGPT for a long time.

Now we know your little secrets 😛

 

[cpvr]

I think it would be a good idea as AI overviews are starting to roll out everywhere, so it would be a beneficial tool for a lot of people.

How’s the development coming along on this?

 

[Baw$e]

I think it would be a good idea as AI overviews are starting to roll out everywhere, so it would be a beneficial tool for a lot of people.

How’s the development coming along on this?

Same here, and because of AI overviews forums/all sites are experiencing a drop in traffic from Google. I'm also curious on the development of this, and especially curious if it'd be implemented into Xenforo.

 

[greenhost.cloud]

Would you be interested in a website integration (such as a JS script) that can auto-apply best practices for SEO?
Just curious if this is something the community is interested in.
For example, automatic SEO for best keywords on forum threads, etc.

Totally, that sounds like a neat tool to help everyone boost their visibility.

 

[Maya]

While AI isn't the best tool for SEO, I sometimes use it for finding keywords and long tail search terms.

 

[Uncrowned Guard]

I really dislike changing content for SEO, and I dislike AI‑rewriting content for SEO even more. I’ve always believed that content should be written for the actual users and readers, not for Google’s crawler. Once you start shaping your writing around what an algorithm wants instead of what your community needs, the whole point of having a forum or a site starts to drift. Unless SEO spam is the point, then sure.

That said, there are parts of SEO that I’m perfectly fine handing off to AI; mainly because they’re basically bots talking to bots at this point. Meta keywords, structured data, all that behind‑the‑scenes boilerplate… I can’t stand doing it manually, and AI is honestly perfect for it. It’s not changing the message; it’s just filling out the technical fields.

Meta descriptions are a bit more important now because of OG thumbnails and how social platforms preview links, but even those are still a mess. Half the time, you don’t know what a platform is going to pull or how it’s going to crop it. So while I treat meta descriptions with a little more care, they’re still not something I consider “content” in the same way as an article or a forum post.

For me, the line is simple: write for humans, automate the parts that only machines care about.