Abortion

Irviding said:
The tea party has a small base of libertarian support and the rest are a bunch of racist pieces of ****.
Prove that a majority of tea-partyists are racists. What if bush were black, then yo would be a racist. Nais left talking point.
 
Cosmic said:
Irviding said:
The tea party has a small base of libertarian support and the rest are a bunch of racist pieces of ****.
Prove that a majority of tea-partyists are racists. What if bush were black, then yo would be a racist. Nais left talking point.

Take a look at all of the people in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S38VioxnBaI

On March 21, 2010, Springboro Tea Party founder Sonny Thomas posted racist slurs against Hispanics on the group's Twitter webpage, including one post that said, "Illegals everywhere today! So many spics makes me feel like a speck. Grrr. Wheres my gun!?".

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca ... 84229.html

http://washingtonindependent.com/73036/ ... rty-leader
 
Show me a million racists in the tea party with absolute proof, then. The tea party is a massive movement of people who don't like either of the two parties. That's why they do not identify as Republicans. where did this racist notion come from? Is it because Obama is not white? What kind of fool do oyu have to be to think that disagreeing with a non-white guy is automatically racism? There are some people who have done racist things in the tea party, but the notion that it's a racist movement is imbecilic.

I suggest you stop our bigoted hate speech against white people and accept them as a movement that disagrees with you. A political discussion automatically goes to hell when someone says the word "racist".

Your pal, Harry Reid, said that Obama is a alight-skinned African "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one". Is Harry a racist?
 
Yes. Calling it "negro dialect" is unacceptable and racist.

But what you don't seem to get is that it's simply not a very tiny small percentage of the Tea Party that is racist. It's a huge gigantic chunk. Read those articles and watch those videos.
 
I think the racists in the tea party are also unacceptable. However, did you know that some lefties are actually going into tea-party events with racist signs? Also there was an ABC news employee a few days ago who tried to out-right provoke some protesters. He screamed at an 80 year old Holocaust surviver with swear words.

Why don't we compromise: a minority of leftists are racists and a minority of tea-partyists are racists. Really, neither of us can prove that more than 100 of the given movement we speak of are racists and there are millions of people in each.
 
Everybody in the NAACP can be called racist. Yet they support liberals 99% of the time.

"All you liberals are racist pieces of shit!"
 
Kirisute Gomen said:
Everybody in the NAACP can be called racist. Yet they support liberals 99% of the time.

"All you liberals are racist pieces of ****!"
What do you expect form an orginization called the "National Association for the Advancement of Colored People" That basically means "National Association for the Advancement of Everyone Who Isn't White"
 
No. I won't compromise on that. It is not by any means a minority at all. Please re-examine the things I've shown to you and you can find other articles about it yourself. I'm not saying that the whole organization is racist but with the Tea Party, just a few months ago, one of the leaders was pushed to resign because of his racist remarks.

It is not just a minority. There is a whole crapload of racists in there just wanting to put up signs for Obama to go "go back to kenya" or whatever other crap.
 
Actually, the tea party is a movement of people who want the government to get off of them and let them do what they want to. Do you seriously think that they are a bunch of red-necks who want to persecute black people because they're black? That is the most offensive and foreign idea out there. I submit to you that the imbeciles running around calling these people "tea-baggers" are the real bigots. You can sit back all day and call people who disagree with you racists, sexists, bigots, homophobes, etc, but believe it or not, you are not the ultimate authority on this. the fact is that no one wants to spite black people because they are black in the year 2010. Wake up and look around you. Get your head out of the past.
 
I think that women should have the right to abortion but, I don't think they should do it.

Kind of like tobacco right now. People have the right to do it, but it's ridiculous to do.
 
Logan18 said:
I think that women should have the right to abortion but, I don't think they should do it.

Kind of like tobacco right now. People have the right to do it, but it's ridiculous to do.
I wish is was that simple, but what about the child's right to live?
 
Cosmic said:
Logan18 said:
I think that women should have the right to abortion but, I don't think they should do it.

Kind of like tobacco right now. People have the right to do it, but it's ridiculous to do.
I wish is was that simple, but what about the child's right to live?
It's not a child. It has no rights. It's not a person. I've argued this point into the ground with you numerous times and you still just don't admit you are wrong.

And referring to your other post on the last page, you can keep dodging me all you want. The Tea Party movement is full of racists who have no fucking idea what the economy is. They just want to go out and call Obama the n word or whatever else. Watch the video, read the articles, and contest them. If you don't do that, I'll assume you agree with me. Like I said, there are plenty of legitimate people in this movement, but in no way is it a 1% minority.
 
You have to view this issue from both sides and decide which is more severe. I believe we should have the freedom to choose. While many say it is murder and the person should be more responsible, I would reply to that with " What if the person was raped?". You have to consider both sides before actually calling something outright inhuman.
 
nextzone said:
You have to view this issue from both sides and decide which is more severe. I believe we should have the freedom to choose. While many say it is murder and the person should be more responsible, I would reply to that with " What if the person was raped?". You have to consider both sides before actually calling something outright inhuman.
And if the person wasn't raped, it should still be the woman's choice. It is her choice. Not some suit in washington or some man sitting in his house.
 
@Irviding: A child is a child. Your fancy scientific lingo does not disque that. Anyway, by your logic, we can kill people in their sleep, because they aren't conscious at the time.

And I guess you can keep filling the room with your hate speech, but actually, it doesn't make it true. Contrary to popular belief, you have toi cite what you say with real stats. Not 2 people, but two million. I define a racist is someone who takes the issue of race and drags it into an issue which it doesn't belong. you, sir, are a racist of the first degree. You are a race-monger and a hate speaker, a liar and a political hack.

See how I turned the racism assertions on you?
 
Cosmic said:
@Irviding: A child is a child. Your fancy scientific lingo does not disque that. Anyway, by your logic, we can kill people in their sleep, because they aren't conscious at the time.

And I guess you can keep filling the room with your hate speech, but actually, it doesn't make it true. Contrary to popular belief, you have toi cite what you say with real stats. Not 2 people, but two million. I define a racist is someone who takes the issue of race and drags it into an issue which it doesn't belong. you, sir, are a racist of the first degree. You are a race-monger and a hate speaker, a liar and a political hack.

See how I turned the racism assertions on you?
Science VS. some guy saying it's alive.. i wonder Who wins?

And you spinning my logic to that is completely ridiculous and frankly laughable.


Well your definition of racism is wrong then 🙂
 
This is how you define racist:

"Someone who disagrees with ANY black person, no matter the context".

And where is the scientific proof that a child comes into existence at a certain exact second?
 
Cosmic said:
This is how you define racist:

"Someone who disagrees with ANY black person, no matter the context".

And where is the scientific proof that a child comes into existence at a certain exact second?
I love how you spin things. You're just like Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity. Pulling things out of your ass to attack my point. I don't see how in any of my posts I said people who disagree with Blacks are racists.

A fetus becomes a person the second born, and then it achieves all rights guaranteed by our Constitution (the one we used to use before Bush became President, if you can remember it)
 
So, what does science tell you happens the second the child comes out of the womb, geographically?

And how are 50+% of all tea party activists racists unless it's for disagreeing with Obama? I have not seen 50% of all Tea Party activists holding n-word signs, have you? That is millions of people.
 
Back
Top Bottom