Abortion

I never said 50%. What I said is that it simply is not just a 'minority' within the Tea Party. There is a good chunk of racists within the Tea Party. It's that simple. Look at the videos of the Rallys (from anywhere but Fox News). You can clearly see the amount of racist signs and racist chants there. There is a very good chunk. That is all I'm saying.

Geographically? I guess after it is delivered, it moves a few paces to have the umbilical cord cut, then maybe a few more paces to be washed off, then maybe a few more paces back into the mother and fathers' arms? We're talking an almost unnoticeable change in Latitude and Longitude though.
 
You'd have to give me about 100,000 videos of tea party activists to justify that statements, if you are going to use that method. alternatively, you could give me a poll. On most of the threads you have posted on here, you have assumed that you ar ethe ultimate authority on every fact. I want sources. Sources which deal with large numbers of people, not less than 100.
 
I've never assumed that. All I've said is that if you care to examine videos of the events, read articles from sites other than Fox News, and do what I told you to do on the last page, you would see what I'm saying. I've already presented you with a video and you've done nothing but ignore it. I'm not wasting my time finding you videos that you'll just ignore. You can search youtube.
 
Then I will tell you this: The racists in the tea party are not jobs who should be shunned. However, the movement has no centralization, so the good ol' boys are free to come if they want to. You cannot characterize a movement like this in that manner. People participate in the movement mostly because they disagree with people like you.
 
Cosmic said:
Then I will tell you this: The racists in the tea party are not jobs who should be shunned. However, the movement has no centralization, so the good ol' boys are free to come if they want to. You cannot characterize a movement like this in that manner. People participate in the movement mostly because they disagree with people like you.
The movement does to have centralization. Who organizes the protests? Who are the ones on the microphones?

A movement is not a movement without centralization. Doesn't work that way. You can't just have masses of people and no leadership.
 
The national tea-parties are organized into local chapters. there is no national centralization. If the Georgia tea-party is a bastion of racism, that doesn't mean the Texas tea party is, they are entirely separate groups.
 
Conservatives aren't necessciarly racist, but most of them are Christian. They don't hate Obama because he's black, but rather because they think what he is doing is wrong and immoral. I sort of agree with them, but some things Obama has done were great.
 
"but most of them are Christian." Sorry, I stopped there. 2004 election results (didn't have anything more recent) showed Christians voted slightly toward the right, but statistically it was even.
 
I meant the politicians. I hear on the news most of the time that they are trying to keep near our roots as much as possible: a Christian nation. But strangely, I think you are right.
 
If you look at a table of religious affiliations of recent Presidents, you will see that the large majority of them are Christian. And in the past 50 years, there hasn't been a majority liberal or conservative Presidency.
 
I don't care about religion. It doesn't belong in government. I don't care if 99% of America is christian. The constitution usurps that.
 
Irviding said:
I don't care about religion. It doesn't belong in government. I don't care if 99% of America is christian. The constitution usurps that.
And thank god for that. heh...
 
My views have changed. Abortion is murder. We have laws against murder. It should be illegal.
Go ahead and curse me out, I don't care. I'm not even looking at this cursed topic again.
 
nextzone said:
My views have changed. Abortion is murder. We have laws against murder. It should be illegal.
Go ahead and curse me out, I don't care. I'm not even looking at this cursed topic again.
Yeah! Just answer one question for me:
12502538_gal.webp
 
nextzone said:
My views have changed. Abortion is murder. We have laws against murder. It should be illegal.
Go ahead and curse me out, I don't care. I'm not even looking at this cursed topic again.
Ok, then when you go to the doctor and get your strep throat medicine to kill the bacteria, I will call the police and have you arrested for murder because you'll be killing cells inside your body.
 
Irviding said:
nextzone said:
My views have changed. Abortion is murder. We have laws against murder. It should be illegal.
Go ahead and curse me out, I don't care. I'm not even looking at this cursed topic again.
Ok, then when you go to the doctor and get your strep throat medicine to kill the bacteria, I will call the police and have you arrested for murder because you'll be killing cells inside your body.
The difference is that an unborn child is still a human. Even of you insist on calling it a fetus, it is still a human fetus which, naturally, would develop into a child and then a grown human.
 
Cosmic said:
Irviding said:
nextzone said:
My views have changed. Abortion is murder. We have laws against murder. It should be illegal.
Go ahead and curse me out, I don't care. I'm not even looking at this cursed topic again.
Ok, then when you go to the doctor and get your strep throat medicine to kill the bacteria, I will call the police and have you arrested for murder because you'll be killing cells inside your body.
The difference is that an unborn child is still a human. Even of you insist on calling it a fetus, it is still a human fetus which, naturally, would develop into a child and then a grown human.
Sperm would then also be human, meaning you'd be killing humans every time you used protection too.
 
@Gimgak: At what point do you think a child comes into existence then? Most liberals believe two contradictory points: that a mother has the right to abort a child, but a mother does not have the right to spank a child. If a mother can MURDER the child a couple months before, what happens that makes the child unspankable? It is cruel to slap a naughty kid around, but murdering it? Oh, that's just the mother's right.

Maybe you're like that discovery channel eco-terrorist. He believed that children should not be born, because they would just become polluters who would help destroy the environment.
 
Cosmic said:
Maybe you're like that discovery channel eco-terrorist. He believed that children should not be born, because they would just become polluters who would help destroy the environment.
Wait What? This made my day :lol:

I believe a mother should be allowed to raise a child as she pleases... within reason. I agree that children these days are out of control though, democrats telling kids they should call the police if they get spanked is disgusting... no better than North Korean children being asked to turn in their parents if they say anything against Kim Jong-il.
 
Back
Top Bottom