AdminAds
Review by Cosmic
First Impressions
[note]========== BEGIN - First Impressions ==========[/note]
Overall, my first impression was "this is a fairly plain forum, nothing special." Nothing about the style really jumps out at me. The logo is very small, simply text with a stock icon beside it, nothing unique to the forum itself, which is something I look for when examining a forum. While your theme is custom designed, there is nothing about it which tells me that it is a custom design, as opposed to a template from MyBB.com, as it is very generic and not related to your niche. Overall, your forum looks like any forum newly created on first examination, and the only thing to distinguish it from an entirely new forum, on a very quick examination, are the statistics and the custom forum icons.
I recommend you revert to your old style, which was better, and work to make modifications to that style which are more unique to your forum, or to, alternatively, find a high-quality designer to make a completely new style. Perhaps your best option is to start with a logo. I don't know what type of budget you have, but you do need a logo that look unique and makes your forum stand out, and that is far more important than a theme.
[note]========== END - First Impressions ==========[/note]
Average
Design Quality
[note]========== BEGIN - Design Quality ==========[/note]
The first impressions section of this review covered that in good detail, but I think I will elaborate on why I do not like your theme, so that you can make modifications to it if necessary, and ensure that your next theme is better. First off, there isn't much color. The only colors are red and green, which means there isn't much life to the forum at all. A third color is almost necessary, in my opinion, to liven things up. FP, for example, has a logo with three different colored bars in it. Also, your design is too flat. While flat designs can be good, yours does not have very much interest to it. It looks more like the designer was lazy than a stylistic choice. Finally, the repetition of the red line below the header and also below category names makes the design look plain and mass-production. Overall, your theme would be a good default theme for a decent forum system, but not a theme for a specific forum.
[note]========== END - Design Quality ==========[/note]
Poor
Site Statistics
[note]========== BEGIN - Site Statistics ==========[/note]
Your statistics are pretty good, in terms of post count. Some of your forums have been posted in today, but not all of them. I recommend you modify your theme to show the date of the last post on the main page. This is how I usually evaluate a site's statistics, both as a reviewer and as a potential member, and if you do not show this it makes me very suspicious.
Looking at the first page of your administrator section, "Managing an Online Community," the statistics look very healthy. The last post on the first page is fairly recent, and each thread has a good number of replies. Some of your other sections, though, appear fairly dead, such as your finance and traffic section.
Overall, keep up the good work, but focus on your less active sections as well.
[note]========== END - Site Statistics ==========[/note]
Good
Staff Professionalism
[note]========== BEGIN - Staff Professionalism ==========[/note]
The first thing I checked was your staff list. This is not very helpful. It lists "P.R.P.," which is an acronym I am unfamiliar with, and Administrators, one of which is "Test" and probably doesn't need to have admin access for security and aesthetic reasons. Also, you should add your Community Team to the staff list. Back to the members on this list, neither of your PRP members have visited this year, which is not a good sign. Your administrators do seem fairly active, though, from a look at your forum team list.
I don't like that two of your staff members have their usernames identical to products. That includes your admin, ArchLinux, and your community team member, JamOnHost. This does not appear professional in my opinion.
[note]========== END - Staff Professionalism ==========[/note]
Good
Originality
[note]========== BEGIN - Originality ==========[/note]
There is nothing much original about your forum. There are a lot of promotion forums, but you don't me to tell you that. I recommend working on the design, as mentioned above, to form your own unique branding. Other than that, there's nothing much you can do to make your website more original without making substantial changes to the niche.
There is one issue I would like to address, though, and that is the names of your forums.
https://theadminzone.com/
You have a category called "Admin Zone," which contains the forums "Managing an Online Community" and "Finance and Traffic," which are two of the most frequently used sections on The Admin Zone, which is one of the most popular admin forums. "Community Cooperative" is also the name of a forum on TAZ. Also, it kind of irks me to see you using "Review Headquarters," since this was in use by FP very recently, and is a pretty unique name.
[note]========== END - Originality ==========[/note]
Very Poor
Site Structure
[note]========== BEGIN - Site Structure ==========[/note]
I don't have much to say about your structure. I think there are a few too many forums, and forums like "Appraisals" do not deserve to be top level forums, but rather subforums, in my book. Overall I do not think this area is the area in which you need to do the most work. I do recommend that your read my above comments on originality, though, particularly as they pertain to structure.
[note]========== END - Site Structure ==========[/note]
Good
Grammar & Spelling
[note]========== BEGIN - Grammar & Spelling ==========[/note]
I do not see any grammatical errors. I recommend that you make sure that most forums have the same name length, approximately. For example, "Hosting" is a short name for a forum, and "Managing an Online Community" is a longer one. They look a bit odd when so close together.
[note]========== END - Grammar & Spelling ==========[/note]
Good
Final Remarks
Your forum is good, but needs work. Your design needs to be made to look a lot more interesting and unique, and you need to work on your forum's originality by renaming the forums which are too similar to TAZ. Good luck!
Your Score