Black Ops Vs. Halo Reach

[Gimgak]

Halo Reach hasn't gotten much publicity compared to Black Ops.

And it comes out tomorrow 😛 I'm sure its gotten a ton of pre-orders though already. Its halo.

@Kevin it has dedi servers at least, Treyarch isn't as stupid as IW was with that move.
And pretty sure some publishers supply "female companions" to reviewers when they have these big 2 day mini vacations when a new gaming is coming out. Heard thats what Bethesda does

 

[Raymond]

@dan the man I highly disagree Halo Reach was played a couple times I believe during the VMAS Black ops was not, And every channel you were on for the past couple days had at least 2-5 commercials in one hour of sitting. All depends on where you are living.

 

[Dark Takua]

Halo is way more better. I just got it today! 😀

 

[death180]

When it comes to rating games, it's a popularity contest. Everyone wanted to see mw2 get a 10 so IGN gave them a 10.

 

[agentmanningctu]

Why don't we all shush and wait til Black Ops comes out. If it's anywhere near as awful as MW2, we know which game wins.

 

[death180]

Well if Black Ops is as bad as MW2 neither wins because Reach isn't on PC.

 

[Uphoreka]

I decided to screw Black Ops and get Halo Reach. Found out that there will be no updates for Black Ops outside of US, UK, Canada.

 

[death180]

Halo. CoD is bound to disappoint just like MW2.

I would give you -rep for that if I could. 😛

That's exactly the reason why the admins took away the -rep ability.


As for Diron, that's what Activision does, the build up hype.. Then they make one tiny decision and bam they lost interest of 20,000 people. Versus Halo so far hasn't disappointed anyone, besides the fact that it is still halo.

 

[Gimgak]

Not to mention anyone playing on the PC apart from the US is basically screwed when it comes to the dedicated server locations. Out of 18 locations, 9 are in the states...