Do you believe Jesus is God

[Nexus]

But you can't prove they are metaphorically speaking, ie, just speculation and assumption from your part....

Blah blah blah.

But you can't prove there's a God or Jesus in the first place...so why are you still talking?

-Rich

 

[Gimgak]

 

[David]

But you can't prove they are metaphorically speaking, ie, just speculation and assumption from your part....

Blah blah blah.

But you can't prove there's a God or Jesus in the first place...so why are you still talking?

-Rich

What good evidence is there to suggest that the atheist is correct? There is none. Therefore the best explanation is a God. Because I can't explain or prove the existence of anything, it doesn't mean it's not there. You voice a typical atheist view "so why are you still talking?". You can't prove otherwise. You have only proved that there is bad evidence for the existence of God, but bad evidence does not conclude to an incorrect statement, which is what science hinges on (trial and error, but we can infer the conclusion is correct).

The Bible is clear evidence to suggest that God/Jesus existed. Can you explain the sudden burst/movement of churches after the resurrection of Jesus?

What about something more philosophical? Where did the universe begin? If you say it came from nothing and therefore has no cause, and I can a designer created it and it has a cause then my argument would seem more plausible. Why are we so lucky to become of existence in a vast universe? Surely there must be some reason.

What immediate experience? People can feel God within themselves, or are you saying they are all delusional? If so, prove it, but you can't use science to prove that, and if you could, you must prove case by case, which is again, what science hinges on.

You can go on and on about no proof for Christianity, but the atheist cannot prove there is no God. Again, this is a debate forum, you don't seem to be giving much of an argument for the atheist, which can infer the atheist is incorrect.

 

[PlayOn]

i don't believe in god/jesus.


You could call me atheist but i prefer the term non-religious.

It is Philosopically impossible to be an theist, since to be an atheist you must have infinite knowledge in order to know absolutely that there is no God. But to have infinite knowledge you would have to be God yourself. It's hard to be God yourself and an atheist at the same time!

The Bible says in Psalm 14:1 'The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God.'

We also know there is a God because God has put into the heart of every person a desire to know him. Romans 1:18-25 makes it all people have an innate knowledge of God, but many have turned their backs to this knowledge and have rejected the revelation of God to follow other gods. The fallacy of atheism is shown in the fact that when people decalre "There is no God' instead of worshipping nothing, they always find something to worship. Man has a spiritual desire for God which he will fill either with the true God or with false gods (your favorite band, video games,favorite sports player,etc.)

Atheism is not a valid philosophy. It is intellectually bankrupt and demonstrates a willful denial of all that God has revealed. It is the very denial of the world around us and all the stars in the heavens.

 

[Gimgak]

It is impossible to be a complete theist too. Both are extremes.

IMO, agnosticism is the only valid philosophy. You can never know for certain.

 

[The Parson]

Just call me convinced that God is God and let me know when supper is ready. All the philosophy in the world is plumb foolishness to God and can never prove what they cannot see without the eyes of faith. Do you believe we had a big explosion in space and after a little cosmic season we had life? Only thing I have seen an explosion do is destroy. God spoke, we have the universe. God formed and breathed into that form a living soul which became man.

OK, I'm done.