Back in 2008 she was battling a lot of mental health issues and was hospitalized over it. To protect not only herself but her image and finances she the conservatorship was created with her father and a co-conservator. Apparently since then the estate has gone from being in debt to nearly a value of 60 Million. However, throughout the years Brittney has been as you would say "restricted" upon what she can do as the conservatorship was made permanent in 2008 to protect the image and finances. The battle now is more to allow her the freedom to live her own life outside of these restrictions.Is there more to the story that maybe I don't know about? I mean, did she threaten to kill her kids or something?
Oh that's easy. Money. Through the conservatorship her father still has access and basically control and say so over her money she makes from all sources. So if he is removed, income = 0. While keeping her under the conservatorship, income = $$$.But what's the point of having a grown adult woman need a conservatorship after all these years? It doesn't make sense.
Which I do remember that. I agree with not making fun of Britney for what she went through especially if you have experienced it or something similar to it.I remember people like to link Craig Ferguson's monologue where he explains why he isn't making fun of Britney because he sees something he experienced himself once. Saw another one posting the video just recently. Guess this documentation reminded some of that again?
Simply because the conservatorship was made indefinite all those years ago which is why she is fighting for it to end.Britney Spears is 39 years old. She shouldn't have anyone else controlling her life. The power her father appears to have over her is insane. I remember that she had a mental breakdown of sorts all those years ago, but I don't understand why that's still relevant in 2021.
Simply because the conservatorship was made indefinite all those years ago which is why she is fighting for it to end.
The conservatorship was granted to her father and a co-conservator at the time. However preventing him from spending a dime of her money wouldn't have made it that much better at the time as they were already in debt due to some of Brittney's financial decisions. However, I do think when they were no longer in debt (which was a few years after the conservatorship was put into place) then it should have ended as long as Brittney was in a better place mentally then she was at the time of the conservatorship going into place. If spending the money meant a positive outcome for her such as removing the debt then I am all for it. Beyond that I feel it is just selfish.Whoever gave her father conservatorship should have limited it for a short period of time and made it to where her father couldn't spend a dime of her money.
Since 2007, Forum Promotion has specialized in providing advertising solutions to webmasters looking to promote their communities. We pride ourselves in being the bridge that connects forum administrators, bloggers, and more.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.