Watch Me Sink
Madly Diligent
How so?
No the prostitutes would have to be checked every week/month. I really don't see how that condom idea is going to work at all lol.Kirisute Gomen said:How can that be enforced? How can one completely ensure that there is no fluid transmission between the two partners? What if one has an open cut? Should both parties undergo rigorous physical examinations before having sex?
HIV antibodies take an average of a month to detect. A more expensive RNA test can detect within 9 days.OBAMA said:No the prostitutes would have to be checked every week/month.Kirisute Gomen said:How can that be enforced? How can one completely ensure that there is no fluid transmission between the two partners? What if one has an open cut? Should both parties undergo rigorous physical examinations before having sex?
Yeah I wasn't talking about the streets I was talking about brothels like those ones in all the movies from the netherlands with the girls dancing in the window.Gimgak said:It's what the laws are in Nevada. I'm not saying it's always enforced but prostitutes are only legal in brothels and the owners are meant to keep up with that. Obviously would be difficult to enforce on the streets, but I don't think that form should be legalized anyway. A high percentage of murders are related to prostitutes, a lot safer in a brothel.
That's not what I would mean by legalizing prostitution. Simply allowing counties to vote on whether or not to allow brothels in them would be the perfect solution. Safer for the prostitutes, and if people don't want brothels near them they would be able to vote on it.mainland marauder said:I dont think it's a good idea to make prostitution legal. The status quo is fine, if we do make it legal, I don't want to have to see prostitutes on the corner of my street every day/night.
Uwe Boll hired prostitutes for one of his movies to save money. If there was no prostitution we'd have no Uwe Boll movies.Kino said:Prostitution is stupid. I don't understand why you have to pay somebody to have sex with you? If you're that desperate for sex, then it's just morally wrong. Paying someone to do something dirty. First of all if you're religious you're breaking a commandment and sinning, and if you take a step back and look at what you're doing, it's just wrong.
And you obviously have not read:Dan said:Make it legal and offer tests to search for STDs/STIs. That way people won't abuse it as much theoretically and all make the people offering the services safer. It would be much better to legalize it really. On the whole it would make peopler safer, take time but it'd be worth it.
Kirisute Gomen said:HIV antibodies take an average of a month to detect. A more expensive RNA test can detect within 9 days.OBAMA said:No the prostitutes would have to be checked every week/month.Kirisute Gomen said:How can that be enforced? How can one completely ensure that there is no fluid transmission between the two partners? What if one has an open cut? Should both parties undergo rigorous physical examinations before having sex?
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/testing/r ... /index.htm
Therefore a woman could only "safely" sell herself at maximum 40 times a year with a RNA test, or 12-13 times with a traditional test.
Kino said:Prostitution is stupid. I don't understand why you have to pay somebody to have sex with you? If you're that desperate for sex, then it's just morally wrong. Paying someone to do something dirty. First of all if you're religious you're breaking a commandment and sinning, and if you take a step back and look at what you're doing, it's just wrong.
I personally agree with this comment 100%.Kino said:Prostitution is stupid. I don't understand why you have to pay somebody to have sex with you? If you're that desperate for sex, then it's just morally wrong. Paying someone to do something dirty. First of all if you're religious you're breaking a commandment and sinning, and if you take a step back and look at what you're doing, it's just wrong.
Well that's all fine and well but don't impose that on a governmental law.2787cmt said:I personally agree with this comment 100%.Kino said:Prostitution is stupid. I don't understand why you have to pay somebody to have sex with you? If you're that desperate for sex, then it's just morally wrong. Paying someone to do something dirty. First of all if you're religious you're breaking a commandment and sinning, and if you take a step back and look at what you're doing, it's just wrong.
I see what you mean though, MissTake. 😛
As a Christian, I see prostitution as just plain wrong.
Since 2007, Forum Promotion has specialized in providing advertising solutions to webmasters looking to promote their communities. We pride ourselves in being the bridge that connects forum administrators, bloggers, and more.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.