Ron Paul or Mitt Romney?

J

jglover4168

Addicted
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
778
Reaction score
0
FP$
6
Who is your choice and why?
I say Ron Paul because he has good values and I think he'll get our country on the right track.
 
Between those two, I'd choose Ron Paul because he's not a fascist.
 
Didn't Ron Paul, sadly, step down? Or is he being quiet about his campaign?

If he is still running, I'll definitely be voting for Paul.
 
Thank you!! I was really hoping he wouldn't. I really don't understand HOW can Mitt be ahead and be winning?
 
Well if you think about it.. Ron Paul is going to put this country in the right direction and that means a lot of jobs will be cut and probably some people who are just riding the system for free.. So a lot of higher up government people are probably doing everything in the power to stop Ron Paul or they will be ousted!
 
I wouldn't choose either. I would choose Obama. He just appeals to me to much. In fact, I'd rather have another black president over a white man.

/Democrat
 
Snobothehobo said:
Between those two, I'd choose Ron Paul because he's not a fascist.
Click to expand...
Also he isn't insane.

I'd choose neither, though if I had to choose I'd pick RP. I too was/still am a huge Ron Paul fan. However, now that it is obvious he won't get the nomination, writing in Ron Paul will do nothing. The media doesn't pay attention to write-ins, and the votes don't really count (though I believe they get reported). I highly suggest anybody who is a big Ron Paul fan to check out Libertarian party candidate, Gary Johnson. He has a few different views from Ron Paul, but overall wants the same thing: lower taxes, less government involvement, decreased government spending. We don't know what he's polling at nationally because only a few polls list him, though most put him around 5%, which if true would put him as the most supported third party candidate since Ross Perot. Also, he will most likely have ballot access in 49 or 50 states.

The two US presidential candidates are terrible and you shouldn't have to go with the lesser of two evils, vote third party. Obama is going to get re-elected anyways.
 
I disagree with just voting for the lesser of the two evils. If we keep doing that, were going to keep getting screwed.
 
jglover4168 said:
I disagree with just voting for the lesser of the two evils. If we keep doing that, were going to keep getting screwed.
Click to expand...
Until we get a third party in (it doesn't matter which third party), there will forever be this stalemate. Too bad everybody just sees politics as Republicans vs Democrats.
 
Democrat said:
I wouldn't choose either. I would choose Obama. He just appeals to me to much. In fact, I'd rather have another black president over a white man.

/Democrat
Click to expand...
I bet this guy preaches that only republicans can be racist bigots :lol:
 
Watch Me Sink said:
The two US presidential candidates are terrible and you shouldn't have to go with the lesser of two evils, vote third party. Obama is going to get re-elected anyways.
Click to expand...
I wish that Obama would at least drop Biden, I have some issues with Obama especially after his racist and ignorant comments to my nationality (probably backed by German agenda but what can you do) but he's no where near as bad as the copyright mafiaso who happens to be his running mate.
 
Gimgak said:
Democrat said:
I wouldn't choose either. I would choose Obama. He just appeals to me to much. In fact, I'd rather have another black president over a white man.

/Democrat
Click to expand...
I bet this guy preaches that only republicans can be racist bigots :lol:
Click to expand...
I don't think that he meant that he wants Obama to win just because he's black... I think he meant that he feels that black people aren't represented well enough in U.S. politics, which is true.
 
Well that's true but the reasoning of voting for someone based on their race is racist no matter how you look at it. I don't care what color someone's skin is, I want someone competent.
 
Gimgak said:
Well that's true but the reasoning of voting for someone based on their race is racist no matter how you look at it. I don't care what color someone's skin is, I want someone competent.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I don't care what race a person is either, but I would like to see more people in politics who aren't straight white Christian men.
 
I find it funny that a supposedly secular nation like the states has no none christians in office while Poland, a country considered strongly catholic has a transexual women in the sejm.

'murica
 
Gimgak said:
I find it funny that a supposedly secular nation like the states has no none christians in office while Poland, a country considered strongly catholic has a transexual women in the sejm.

'murica
Click to expand...
It depends. If you ask Sarah Palin, we're very much a Christian nation.
 
Well, at this point, it is Mitt Romney. And also if I recall correctly, hasn't Ron Paul retired right after the nomination?
 
Nope, It has been confirmed (yesterday) through the RNC that Ron Paul has enough states to be on the ballot in Tampa. It is not over for Ron Paul!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

About Us

Since 2007, Forum Promotion has specialized in providing advertising solutions to webmasters looking to promote their communities. We pride ourselves in being the bridge that connects forum administrators, bloggers, and more.

Sponsors

Affiliates

    Universal Gaming The Coffee House

Stay Connected

Back
Top Bottom