Well either way is fine. You dont lose any sensation if you have it done, that is a myth. Also If you have had it done a girl is more inclined to... well we dont need get into that. I dont see a problem with either way. If I had a boy I would probably have it done to him.
Circumcision
- Thread starter Driver
- Start date
Mr. Bond said:
Lol you don't know anything you do. Go research and you'll see it actually is healther to do it. I was joking about the infection thing, but you took it too seriously.
Here is the link if you don't want to search "Mr.Bond" lol : http://www.circumcisioninfo.com/schoen1.html
You actually dont. Do some research. Many studies have shown that people that have had it done and people that havent feel equal amounts of pleasure during sex.Mr. Bond said:
I will just throw out a hypothetical situation for all of those who actually believe that circumcised men lose sensitivity: If it were true, that wouldnt be such a bad thing as the more sensitive guys wouldnt last as long in bed. -D-
Snorki said:
This is only the case for those who do not take regular baths / showers, and who have unprotected sex.
Other than that, i agree with what Mr. Bond said. ~wink~
mikeswim07
Familiar Face
I have had it done, my kids will have it done. It is just healthier to get it done. and it looks better too.
mikeswim07
Familiar Face
It's healthier because bacteria and cr*p can stay in the foreskin.
Dr. Edgar Schoen is a creepy old man. *shiver* seriously, has anyone seen the Penn and Teller Bullsh!t on circ where he sings a song about circumcision? LOL Coo coo.
Anyways, to circumcise newborn males for non therapeutic reasons is a violation of human rights. I don't care what your personal preference is, its not your "part". In America, the rates are getting lower and our females are protected BY LAW against genital cutting of any kind. You cannot even draw blood there, its illegal. Why are our males not protected?
A foreskin is a self cleaning organ, even when people didnt have running water, they weren't dropping dead from infected foreskins in alarming rates. Now that we do have means to wash ourselves daily the rate of possible foreskin complications is even lower. An intact baby requires no retraction as the foreskin is fused to the head for the first few years. This makes it impossible for anything to get under there and cause infections. You simply wash the outside of it like any other body part. Once retractable, its simple to pull back, rinse and replace.
The foreskin itself is laden with nerve endings. If you cut it off, you automatically have less feelings. You cant have something that isn't there. The inner foreskin is a mucosal lining, just the same as the inside of your lips and eyes. It keeps the glans (head) moist and soft. If you remove it, the glans is now exposed to fabric for the rest of your life. The friction causes the glans to become dry and calloused, like the palms of your hands compared to the tops. This results in a less sensitive response to touch. This is not a con for men with foreskins as they dont "go quicker". It just allows for a natural movement during. Sex as nature intended.
I have 3 kids, (1 girl, 2 boys) and a husband. Our whole family is intact without a single problem. If you tried to take my guys foreskins they would think you were insane! They are quite attached, emotionally and physically, haha. If my sons decided to get cut as adults, have at it, thats exactly why I left the choice to them. Men out there who were cut at birth and happy about it, great. But remember, that is your personal preference and it shouldn't be carved into your child. Let him decide.
Anyways, to circumcise newborn males for non therapeutic reasons is a violation of human rights. I don't care what your personal preference is, its not your "part". In America, the rates are getting lower and our females are protected BY LAW against genital cutting of any kind. You cannot even draw blood there, its illegal. Why are our males not protected?
A foreskin is a self cleaning organ, even when people didnt have running water, they weren't dropping dead from infected foreskins in alarming rates. Now that we do have means to wash ourselves daily the rate of possible foreskin complications is even lower. An intact baby requires no retraction as the foreskin is fused to the head for the first few years. This makes it impossible for anything to get under there and cause infections. You simply wash the outside of it like any other body part. Once retractable, its simple to pull back, rinse and replace.
The foreskin itself is laden with nerve endings. If you cut it off, you automatically have less feelings. You cant have something that isn't there. The inner foreskin is a mucosal lining, just the same as the inside of your lips and eyes. It keeps the glans (head) moist and soft. If you remove it, the glans is now exposed to fabric for the rest of your life. The friction causes the glans to become dry and calloused, like the palms of your hands compared to the tops. This results in a less sensitive response to touch. This is not a con for men with foreskins as they dont "go quicker". It just allows for a natural movement during. Sex as nature intended.
I have 3 kids, (1 girl, 2 boys) and a husband. Our whole family is intact without a single problem. If you tried to take my guys foreskins they would think you were insane! They are quite attached, emotionally and physically, haha. If my sons decided to get cut as adults, have at it, thats exactly why I left the choice to them. Men out there who were cut at birth and happy about it, great. But remember, that is your personal preference and it shouldn't be carved into your child. Let him decide.
Affiliates
