List Of Free Backlink Builders

StevenF50 said:
Hmm yes quality backlinks are better.
Click to expand...

Theres no such thing as good or bad backlinks, however to increase your ranking they need to be relevant to your site.

EG:
If you run a forum about say Safari Parks, and then Longleat has a link on it's site to you that is a relevant backlink and will score higher than say a link from a garden centre which isn't relative to your genre.
The higher the PR of the relevant site that is providing the backlink the more it will help to increase your PR.

Everyone should take note that PR cannot be increased simply through one method, it's a combination of all things SEO that increase your rank:

A high PR is useless without traffic
Traffic is useless unless it spends time on your site, and goes deeper than the index page.
Backlinks do increase PR, but google also tracks which backlinks are generating traffic.

The best way to keep an eye on all this, is sign up to Google webmaster, e-mail and site verification will be required, then use Google analytics, if you do this you will be surprised just how much Google knows about your site.


Every time you try some thing to increase your traffic/rank/Pr whatever, you should do so one thing at a time, and give Googles bots time to analyse the results and display them to you, normally i allow a week from completion of promotion to seeing it on screen in google
 
So your saying a backlink on a whois site or a link farm is as good as one a non similar genre site?
 
StevenF50 said:
So your saying a backlink on a whois site or a link farm is as good as one a non similar genre site?
Click to expand...

Google does not rate back links in the way people think they do, a back link is rated by the relevance of the donor site to your site, that is what helps to increase your PR.

In saying that, traffic also has a relevance on PR, you can have very few backlinks and massive traffic, and still be top in organic searches for some or all of your keywords.

SEO optimisation is a minefield, and for every way there is of trying to increase your PR artificially, Google are designing algorithms to combat spam links and referrals.

Like I said the best way to see what does and doesn't work is to use Analytics.

I'll give you an example on April 2nd I spent $20 (£12.50) on a site which promised me 50000 back links within 15 days, as of 1700 today not one of those backlinks is appearing in my analytics, ok by my own words I should wait until the period for posting them is over, but so far it's not working in this example.
You really need to build quality back links yourself, and keep an eye on what key words are being picked up, if the ones you have chosen are not, you need to adjust them, and keep an eye on your stats on Googles webmaster pages.

What you have to remember is that very few people will use Google to search for a specific thing

For example:
Searching for Manutd forums very few would actually enter "Man Utd.com" or "Red Cafe" browsers are intelligent enough to find those now without Google.

People tend to enter things like "Manutd message board" or "Man utd forum"

If you google those two examples, you will find Red Cafe and Man Utd.com talking reds at the top, use firebug to inspect their relative Keywords in the overall header files and you will find very little, traffic has put them at the top of the tree, not keywords, SEO's or backlinks, they are there because they were the first, and for no other reason.
 
If I made a site got 1000's of backlinks on whois and site price checkers then I also made a site and got 1000's of backlinks on unrelated genres but on sites that don't have many advertisements, I'm 100% sure the second site would get better SEO rankings.
 
StevenF50 said:
If I made a site got 1000's of backlinks on whois and site price checkers then I also made a site and got 1000's of backlinks on unrelated genres but on sites that don't have many advertisements, I'm 100% sure the second site would get better SEO rankings.
Click to expand...

This is a much discussed subject on Google forums,and to be honest there is no magic cure, google is very protective of how it's algorithms actually work, and how they calculate PR, it's like coca cola's secret recipe, no one person knows all of it.

What you say is probably true, and bears out what I say about there being no such thing as a bad back link, the reason the second is better is not because the links are on active sites, but because they WILL get clicks and impressions.

Google now uses a tracker algorithm, where by it can trace the origin of the click to your site, that is why now you should avoid traffic spamming sites, now so long ago clicks from these sites would show up from the click originator, sign up to one now and they show as traffic spam originator, so I have a feeling Google will discount these clicks when calculating PR.
 
@ezClickBank Added, thanks.
@Bart Your welcome, just be careful using them and not to overdo it or it will hurt your SEO ranking.
 
Yeah this may have a more negative effect if your page rank decreases due to being penalized.
 
Thanks for this list, it rocks lots of ping's never hurt no body. Tons of links...I guess.
 
I'm bringing this thread back, I've removed dead ones and added news ones including shadyx's pingbomb!
 
Nice share! But all backlinks need to be pinged otherwise no one will know they exist!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

About Us

Since 2007, Forum Promotion has specialized in providing advertising solutions to webmasters looking to promote their communities. We pride ourselves in being the bridge that connects forum administrators, bloggers, and more.

Sponsors

Affiliates

    Universal Gaming The Coffee House

Stay Connected

Back
Top Bottom