I think your little rant...fit...is pretty funny. Calling names? Obviously not everyone is going to have the same opinon than you do but does that give you the right to try to break down and start calling names instead of supporting your position, whos validity is under heavy scrutiny?I really don't see how any of this is funny.
Wow...just...wow...wouldnt that prove my point? That life can suck and when it does we should deal with it as best we can?? LOLLife can really suck at times.. how dare you say that... Go get raped, then come back here, and tell me that you are "dealing with it the best way you can" and "life can really suck".
Now, now, this is not how we have a civil debate. I havent called you any names even though I feel you support death over life. I can articulate my feelings into debate instead of releasing it in a raw and imature fashion.but you with your degenerate, arrogant, sexist attitude, are a disgusting piece of garbage.
Is it because you are in a corner and cant defend your position? I actually had a feeling you were going to try dodging the debate. Odd that you wish me a good day and yet call me childish names and refuse to support your views. I understand this is your ploy to back out of the debate. Its ok. When you want to continue the debate I will be here.And with that, I refuse to answer any more of your posts. Have a good day.
MOST of them are tearing themselves up...And yet you support it.Women who have an abortion are traumatized by the entire experience.[...]most of them are tearing themselves up inside for it
You can get an STD without having sex.mainland marauder said:The opponents keep arguing that women shouldn't have the right to abort due to them "opened their legs" and deserve to take the responsibility. Something I have to say to that is, then should we not research to cure aids and STDs. Because a big chunk of the people who have aids got it from unprotected sex of course so that means people should take the responsibility for messing up I guess. The saame applies with stds, you can't get an STD without having sex (minus the vector STDs) so we should just let people die for opening their legs and not protecting themselves?
I am against anything that disposes of something with 46 chromosomes, that has human DNA.The don't take a life phenonmenen keeps coming up in this topic, or at least the first 2 pages and last 3, I didn't have the energy to read all 30. Then again as people have mentioned should we not allow women to dispose of the egg that comes out during mensturation? Should we make masturbation illegal because it kills a potential life? The morning after pill too, i'm not sure exactly how it works but that also stops a potential life.
I think you just contradicted yourself multiple times there.My view is personally pro life, i dont like abortions, i think its just awful and i don't know those gynocologists have the ability to do what they do but it has to be legal. Its simple reproductive rights.
My 2 cents
Well if we want to take it another step, we could get into the issues of population control. If abortion is illegal - more babies born (though it will still happen) and the population will rise greatly. The bad part of that, the population is going to rise greatly in poor non well off areas that babies should not be living in the first place, because these poor teenagers and young mothers who would have gotten an abortion in the first place, when she is too young to take care of the child, or has no money at the time, is now forced to bare a child.GamingOn said:haha me? It's just true less abortions means more babies. 🙂 Mines simple.
Aww sheet man, im a real murderer then. my cells divide all the time! That means they're dieing, and they're human DNA!Kirisute Gomen said:I am against anything that disposes of something with 46 chromosomes, that has human DNA.
I saw that, but you can easily transfer STDs by sexual contact or by transfer of body fluids.And he did recognize that you can get stds from not having sex. The vector STDs from the insects and stuff of course, as he mentioned. I can see his point, again, just further clarifying that fact.
Kirisute, so by that logic, you are in fact against the morning after pill. The morning after pill does stop the fertilized egg from attaching to the wall of the uterus.
In that case of course I would rather the morning after pill, but they essentially do the same thing. They both take a "potential life".Kirisute Gomen said:I saw that, but you can easily transfer STDs by sexual contact or by transfer of body fluids.And he did recognize that you can get stds from not having sex. The vector STDs from the insects and stuff of course, as he mentioned. I can see his point, again, just further clarifying that fact.
Kirisute, so by that logic, you are in fact against the morning after pill. The morning after pill does stop the fertilized egg from attaching to the wall of the uterus.
I am against that, however if somebody is determined to not have a child, I'd rather them use the morning after pill than have an abortion. Both cause the loss of life, but abortion essentially murders a baby, while the morning after pill allows it to not develop.
Adoption... the #1 bullshít answer given by every pro life person I know or have ever heard of. If adoption is so good, why are there thousands of kids waiting to be adopted in every state? Want that to turn to the hundred thousands if abortion is made illegal? Nothing wrong with hundreds of thousands of children having no families and living in some shítty state run center right?PhairChild said:I personally feel dont do abortion. If you feel you cant take care of it, theres a cool thing called adoption... Give the kid a chance in life.
The state centers are not that bad. Wouldn't it be better to live without parents and in a center than to have no chance at life at all? If they're in the center at least when they're older they have a chance to make something of themselves.OBAMA said:Adoption... the #1 bullshít answer given by every pro life person I know or have ever heard of. If adoption is so good, why are there thousands of kids waiting to be adopted in every state? Want that to turn to the hundred thousands if abortion is made illegal? Nothing wrong with hundreds of thousands of children having no families and living in some shítty state run center right?PhairChild said:I personally feel dont do abortion. If you feel you cant take care of it, theres a cool thing called adoption... Give the kid a chance in life.
What gives you the right to make that call? Why do you get to say that the potential offspring of someone else belongs in a state run shíthole for 20 years?Anathema said:The state centers are not that bad. Wouldn't it be better to live without parents and in a center than to have no chance at life at all? If they're in the center at least when they're older they have a chance to make something of themselves.OBAMA said:Adoption... the #1 bullshít answer given by every pro life person I know or have ever heard of. If adoption is so good, why are there thousands of kids waiting to be adopted in every state? Want that to turn to the hundred thousands if abortion is made illegal? Nothing wrong with hundreds of thousands of children having no families and living in some shítty state run center right?PhairChild said:I personally feel dont do abortion. If you feel you cant take care of it, theres a cool thing called adoption... Give the kid a chance in life.
OBAMA said:What gives you the right to make that call?
Since 2007, Forum Promotion has specialized in providing advertising solutions to webmasters looking to promote their communities. We pride ourselves in being the bridge that connects forum administrators, bloggers, and more.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.